Racist President Trump Shares Video of Supporter Yelling 'White Power' at Protesters

'Indefensible': Trump slammed for sharing video where supporter yells 'white power' at protesters


President Donald Trump came under fire Sunday after sharing a video in which a supporter twice shouts "white power."

"Thank you to the great people of The Villages. The Radical Left Do Nothing Democrats will Fall in the Fall. Corrupt Joe is shot. See you soon!!!" the president tweeted along with a video of a golf parade of his supporters in The Villages, a massive retirement community in central Florida. 

White House Deputy Press Secretary Judd Deere said Trump was not aware the supporter had shouted the white supremacist slogan. 

"President Trump is a big fan of The Villages. He did not hear the one statement made on the video. What he did see was tremendous enthusiasm from his many supporters,” Deere said in a statement. 

The encounter between Trump supporters and critics comes amid nationwide protests against racial discrimination and police brutality. The president's decision to share the video of the encounter was quickly condemned, as critics seized upon the tweet as more evidence to support their claim that Trump is a racist, an assertion Trump has strongly denied. 

"Trump shared a video where his supporter screams “white power” twice, which shouldn’t surprise anyone since Trump’s the biggest racist in the world," tweeted Scott Dworkin, co-founder of the anti-Trump Democratic Coalition. 

"We have actually gotten to the point in this horrific journey that the President of the United States has tweeted a video of his supporter shouting 'White Power!' He doesn’t deserve one single vote," tweeted former Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill. 

Replying to
Well he's been throwing up the hand sign Jewish Defamation League has labeled as officially a White Power hand sign..
It used to be called the "A-Ok" sign maybe that was some Secret Society kinda twisted coded "White Powers" A-Ok ...????

"This is Donald Trump’s presidency: circulating video of supporter yelling 'white power!'" said CNN White House correspondent John Harwood. 

Other critics noted that the protesters in the video also appeared to be residents of The Villages, as did several other anti-Trump protesters featured in the video. 

Republican Sen. Tim Scott said on CNN'S "State of the Union," before the video was removed from Trump's Twitter feed, that he should delete the post.

"There's no question he should not have retweeted it and he should just take it down." Scott said. He called the video "offensive" and "indefensible," but added that he refused to "play politics with it." 


Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar told CNN he had not seen the video, "but obviously neither the president, his administration nor I would do anything to be supportive of white supremacy or anything that would support discrimination of any kind." 

Azar declined to comment when host Jake Tapper asked him if the president's tweet had been a "mistake." 


The tweet was one of a series posted by Trump Sunday morning. In others, he referred to the presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden as a "Low IQ person," falsely claimed to have stopped the vandalization of public monuments by "imposing a very powerful 10-year prison sentence" on the vandalism and denounced the news media for reports that he had been told about an intelligence report that said Russia had put a bounty on U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

The Lincoln Coalition, a super PAC formed by anti-Trump conservatives, shared an ad about the Russian bounty report that condemned Trump for not retaliating against Russia and implied his "white power" tweet was intended to distract from the new scandal. 


This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: 'Indefensible': Trump slammed for sharing video where supporter yells 'white power' at protesters

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

That Uplifting Tweet You Just Shared? A Russian Troll Sent It

Image
Here’s what Russia’s 2020 disinformation operations look like, according to two experts on social media and propaganda. By   DARREN LINVILL   &   PATRICK WARREN Internet trolls don’t troll. Not the professionals at least. Professional trolls don’t go on social media to antagonize liberals or belittle conservatives. They are not narrow minded, drunk or angry. They don’t lack basic English language skills. They certainly aren’t  “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds,”  as the president once put it. Your stereotypical trolls do exist on social media, but the amateurs aren’t a threat to Western democracy. Professional trolls, on the other hand, are the tip of the spear in the new digital, ideological battleground. To combat the threat they pose, we must first understand them — and take them seriously. MORE: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russia-troll-2020-election-interference-twitter-916482/ Posted by Jamie B.
Read more

The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term

Image
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term   (Photo: Photos: Getty Images) Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President  Donald Trump  could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent  Joe Biden  when more votes are tallied.  This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President  Mike Pence , with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president. This is arguably the most likely of th
Read more

Philosophical Question #14 – Lifestyle Choices

Image
Here is an interesting question in my list of philosophical questions: 1.) Should governments have penalties for those who live unhealthy lifestyles? A list of unhealthy lifestyles would include things like smoking, drinking, illegal drugs, prostitution, and other “vice” type activities. I guess the “government penalties” would be referring to monetary punishments, withholding medical treatments (insurance companies would love that), possibly imposing/regulating very high (exorbitant) prices on things considered unhealthy in order to cut down on their use, and other possibilities. 2.) Or, would you say that living an unhealthy lifestyle, likely resulting in a LOT of eventual personal pain and suffering, should be punishment enough for unhealthy lifestyles? When people make bad choices in life, often in their youth where ignorance and immediate gratification takes them over,  3.) Should a society be obligated to help "fix" them, by way of tax money?   Is that part of
Read more