It was there all the time - by Lance



Supreme Court rules gay workers protected from job discrimination, in big win for LGBT rights

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-rules-gay-workers-protected-from-job-discrimination-in-big-win-for-lgbt-rights

As the resident conservative of this Snowy blog let me be the first to give our Supreme Court a hand.  And for this court it was a lopsided decision, probably opposite of what was expected.

I'm certain some in Conservative circles will be crying foul.  They will call it judicial activism.  Even the desenting opinion hinted at it.

I see it as a a very fair interpretation of the actual words in Title VII.  Actually, a single word.  That word is SEX.  What does discrimination based on one's sex mean?  Literally it means you cant treat a man different than a woman, or vice versa.

Equal treatment has always been there.  You cant treat a man who loves another man different than a woman who loves a man.  It's right there in plain sight.  We were just looking in the wrong place.

We thought we needed new laws to match new norms.  What we needed was a fresh look at what was already there.  Now I'm going to go off the rails for my left leaning friends.

You dont always need a new law when something happens you dont like.  Do we need to challenge the status quo?  Yes.  It may even take legal challenges.   But not always a new, convoluted law that somebody has to interpret 50 years from now.

We didnt need new marriage laws, we didnt need new discrimination laws.  We measure the success of our law makers by the new laws they make.  Maybe that's the wrong standard.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

That Uplifting Tweet You Just Shared? A Russian Troll Sent It

The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term

When Life Hands You Lemons