Republican Congressman Charged with 3 Felonies Related to Illegal Voting



Steve Watkins, a Republican congressman in Kansas, was charged with three felonies and a misdemeanor on Tuesday related to illegally voting in a 2019 local race. The charges came in a state where Republicans have for years pointed to evidence of widespread non-citizen voting, with little evidence.

Prosecutors did not provide details of the charges but said they were related to a 2019 local election. The Topeka Capital-Journal previously reported that Watkins changed his voter registration address to a local UPS store in Topeka in August 2019. He made the change to hide that he was living with his parents at the time, according to the Kansas City Star. Watkins also allegedly lied to a detective about the matter in February, according to court documents obtained by the Star.

Watkins’ change of address was significant because it placed him in a city council district different than the one he was actually living in. The city council district race Watkins voted in was decided by just 13 votes in November 2019, according to the Capital-Journal.

Watkins, a first-term congressman who represents the eastern part of Kansas, was charged with voting without being qualified, marking/transmitting more than one advance ballot, and obstructing law enforcement. He was also charged with a misdemeanor for failing to notify the state of a change of address.


Watkins chief of staff told the Capital-Journal the congressman made a mistake in registering at the UPS address. But Bryan Piligra, a spokesman for Watkins’ re-election campaign also noted the charges were announced just before Watkins was set to participate in a primary debate.

“They couldn’t have been more political if they tried,” he said in a statement. “Just like President Trump, Steve is being politically prosecuted by his opponents who can’t accept the results of the last election.”


Voting without being qualified is punishable with between 15 and 17 months in prison for a first-time offender, according to the Kansas City Star. The other two felonies are punishable by seven to nine months in prison.

The charges come as Donald Trump and other Republicans have stirred fears that the 2020 election will be tainted by significant voter fraud, though several studies have shown that voter fraud is extremely rare and isolated. The most high-profile election fraud case in recent years involved another Republican running for Congress in 2018 who hired an operative who illegally collected mail-in ballots.

Prosecutors across the US have used cases in which people vote while ineligible, even by mistake, to set an example. In Texas, Crystal Mason, an African American woman, didn’t know she was ineligible to vote but was sentenced to five years in prison for attempting to vote in 2016 while on supervised release for a felony conviction (an appeal is ongoing). In North Carolina, prosecutors have also filed criminal charges in recent years against people with felony convictions and non-citizens who voted.


In Kansas, the former secretary of state Kris Kobach, a Republican, built his national profile by suggesting there were a significant number of non-citizens on the state’s voter rolls. His signature achievement was getting the legislature to pass a law requiring voters to provide documents proving their citizenship when they register to vote. But a federal court struck down the law, saying it placed an unlawful burden on voters and noting just 67 non-citizens had either attempted to register or had registered over nearly two decades.

Bob Salera, a spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee, the campaign arm of House Republicans, said the group was aware of the charges and seeking more information.

Sam Levine in New York  


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

That Uplifting Tweet You Just Shared? A Russian Troll Sent It

Image
Here’s what Russia’s 2020 disinformation operations look like, according to two experts on social media and propaganda. By   DARREN LINVILL   &   PATRICK WARREN Internet trolls don’t troll. Not the professionals at least. Professional trolls don’t go on social media to antagonize liberals or belittle conservatives. They are not narrow minded, drunk or angry. They don’t lack basic English language skills. They certainly aren’t  “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds,”  as the president once put it. Your stereotypical trolls do exist on social media, but the amateurs aren’t a threat to Western democracy. Professional trolls, on the other hand, are the tip of the spear in the new digital, ideological battleground. To combat the threat they pose, we must first understand them — and take them seriously. MORE: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russia-troll-2020-election-interference-twitter-916482/ Posted by Jamie B.
Read more

The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term

Image
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term   (Photo: Photos: Getty Images) Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President  Donald Trump  could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent  Joe Biden  when more votes are tallied.  This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President  Mike Pence , with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president. This is arguably the most likely of th
Read more

Philosophical Question #14 – Lifestyle Choices

Image
Here is an interesting question in my list of philosophical questions: 1.) Should governments have penalties for those who live unhealthy lifestyles? A list of unhealthy lifestyles would include things like smoking, drinking, illegal drugs, prostitution, and other “vice” type activities. I guess the “government penalties” would be referring to monetary punishments, withholding medical treatments (insurance companies would love that), possibly imposing/regulating very high (exorbitant) prices on things considered unhealthy in order to cut down on their use, and other possibilities. 2.) Or, would you say that living an unhealthy lifestyle, likely resulting in a LOT of eventual personal pain and suffering, should be punishment enough for unhealthy lifestyles? When people make bad choices in life, often in their youth where ignorance and immediate gratification takes them over,  3.) Should a society be obligated to help "fix" them, by way of tax money?   Is that part of
Read more