FREEDOM OF SPEECH ??

Freedom of Speech?

Let's discuss it.

NO - I don't mean the first amendment version of "free speech"

I mean your perception, your ideals, your partisan views, your personal opinion.

With social media outlets nowadays either being mocked for not deleting hateful content, or with others mocking the mainstream media for bias reporting, and yet everyone saying "I want my voice heard" and "I should say whatever I want to", I am asking...

When should free speech not be free any more?
What level of censorship is enough or not enough for you?

Example:
I censor free speech on here because I won't abide racism, bigotry, idiocy, or partisan trolling.
However, other channels allow an almost free-for-all environment, where people can freely name-call and belittle each other and make all kinds of hateful and hurtful comments because to them it is "free speech"

Ironically, I find that those who have taken up the mantle of calling the MSM "fake news" are the first to post partisan news from unreliable and deeply partisan news sites. OH, the irony!

The latest:
ZUCKERBERG TELLS FOX NEWS FACEBOOK WON'T CENSOR POLITICIANS, WHILE WARREN SAYS FACEBOOK COULD HELP TRUMP WIN AGAIN

https://www.newsweek.com/zuckerberg-tells-fox-news-facebook-wont-censor-politicians-while-warren-says-facebook-could-help-1466117


Personally, I think both parties are wrong, Zuckerberg needs to do a better job of screening out Russian propaganda, while Warren is again demonstrating tendencies to be over the top in her rhetoric.

But even the "media" for the most part, tends to keep away from posting anything deliberately hateful or bigoted, the main issue is "social media" which generally practices "say whatever you want" except when properly administered like places like Snowflake's Forum.


So PLEASE people, let's not pass judgement on each other's opinions, I want to know YOUR view on what should or should not be considered "free speech" and PLEASE don't use this opportunity to attack your least favorite party or politician or each other, just stick to the topic.


GO FOR IT.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

That Uplifting Tweet You Just Shared? A Russian Troll Sent It

Image
Here’s what Russia’s 2020 disinformation operations look like, according to two experts on social media and propaganda. By   DARREN LINVILL   &   PATRICK WARREN Internet trolls don’t troll. Not the professionals at least. Professional trolls don’t go on social media to antagonize liberals or belittle conservatives. They are not narrow minded, drunk or angry. They don’t lack basic English language skills. They certainly aren’t  “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds,”  as the president once put it. Your stereotypical trolls do exist on social media, but the amateurs aren’t a threat to Western democracy. Professional trolls, on the other hand, are the tip of the spear in the new digital, ideological battleground. To combat the threat they pose, we must first understand them — and take them seriously. MORE: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russia-troll-2020-election-interference-twitter-916482/ Posted by Jamie B.
Read more

The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term

Image
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term   (Photo: Photos: Getty Images) Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President  Donald Trump  could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent  Joe Biden  when more votes are tallied.  This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President  Mike Pence , with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president. This is arguably the most likely of th
Read more

Philosophical Question #14 – Lifestyle Choices

Image
Here is an interesting question in my list of philosophical questions: 1.) Should governments have penalties for those who live unhealthy lifestyles? A list of unhealthy lifestyles would include things like smoking, drinking, illegal drugs, prostitution, and other “vice” type activities. I guess the “government penalties” would be referring to monetary punishments, withholding medical treatments (insurance companies would love that), possibly imposing/regulating very high (exorbitant) prices on things considered unhealthy in order to cut down on their use, and other possibilities. 2.) Or, would you say that living an unhealthy lifestyle, likely resulting in a LOT of eventual personal pain and suffering, should be punishment enough for unhealthy lifestyles? When people make bad choices in life, often in their youth where ignorance and immediate gratification takes them over,  3.) Should a society be obligated to help "fix" them, by way of tax money?   Is that part of
Read more