An instrument on NASA's InSight lander has been stuck in the Martian soil for months, but engineers have come up with a new plan to try to save the device.
The InSight lander's self-hammering heat probe, also known as "the mole," has been stuck in place since Feb. 28. It was supposed to burrow 16 feet (5 meters) into the ground, but it stalled way short, at 14 inches (35 centimeters).
To be fair to the mole, it's digging into unknown territory. Nothing has ever dug that deep in Martian soil before, so it's hard to predict what the regolith is made of. NASA and the German space agency, which made the mole and the Heat Flow and Physical Properties Package (HP3) of which it is a part, have been working together since June on alternative fixes.
Their latest idea is to push the mole against the wall of the hole it created, using another instrument: InSight's scoop, which is located on a robotic arm. Since the mole is slipping in the hole as it tries to dig further, forcing the instrument against the wall just might work, officials said. "This might increase friction enough to keep it [the mole] moving forward when mole hammering resumes," Sue Smrekar, InSight deputy principal investigator at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said in a statement.
The mole is intended to measure heat flow from the interior of Mars, which will help answer questions about whether there is volcanic activity on the planet and how similar the geologic histories of Earth and Mars are. This is all central to NASA's ongoing search for life on Mars, since life as we know it, on planet Earth, formed on an active world, with volcanoes and plate tectonics. It's unclear how geologically active Mars is, and scientists are still learning a lot about processes such as possible "marsquakes" and volcanic activity.
The mole is supposed to dig autonomously, and it isn't supposed to be removed from its hole once it starts to dig. A few months ago, engineers instead tried removing a support structure that is supposed to hold the mole in place. They did this to better examine the hole and the area in which the mole was slipping. Pictures sent back from Mars showed that the mole is burrowing into "duricrust," a sort of cemented soil. No other Mars mission has ever encountered this kind of soil, and thus, the mole wasn't designed for it.
The Instrument Deployment Camera on NASA's InSight lander caught sight of its robotic arm moving the support structure for the "mole," a digging instrument that has stopped tunneling down through the Martian surface.
The team spent months using the arm scoop to try to collapse the hole, but the arm is being used at an angle that nobody anticipated during mission testing. The scoop was originally intended to serve as a landscaping tool that would be used only in the event that InSight didn't have a clear, flat spot to deploy its instruments. The HP3 instrument is placed very far away from the lander so that the spacecraft's shadow won't mess with the temperature readings the heat probe is supposed to gather from underground. The position of HP3 means the arm must stretch far out and press its scoop down on an angle to reach the hole, which doesn't provide much force to collapse the regolith.
"We're asking the arm to punch above its weight," Ashitey Trebi-Ollennu, the lead arm engineer at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, California, said in the same statement. "The arm can't push the soil the way a person can. This would be easier if it could, but that's just not the arm we have."
Alternatively, the scoop could be used to bring more soil into the hole so the mole could regain traction that way. NASA will continue to monitor the mole's progress and take pictures of its work. Both techniques to rescue the instrument, the scooping and the pressing, might be visible in raw images beamed onto this website in the coming weeks.
Here’s what Russia’s 2020 disinformation operations look like, according to two experts on social media and propaganda. By DARREN LINVILL & PATRICK WARREN Internet trolls don’t troll. Not the professionals at least. Professional trolls don’t go on social media to antagonize liberals or belittle conservatives. They are not narrow minded, drunk or angry. They don’t lack basic English language skills. They certainly aren’t “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds,” as the president once put it. Your stereotypical trolls do exist on social media, but the amateurs aren’t a threat to Western democracy. Professional trolls, on the other hand, are the tip of the spear in the new digital, ideological battleground. To combat the threat they pose, we must first understand them — and take them seriously. MORE: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russia-troll-2020-election-interference-twitter-916482/ Posted by Jamie B.
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term (Photo: Photos: Getty Images) Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President Donald Trump could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent Joe Biden when more votes are tallied. This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President Mike Pence , with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president. This is arguably the most likely of th
Here is an interesting question in my list of philosophical questions: 1.) Should governments have penalties for those who live unhealthy lifestyles? A list of unhealthy lifestyles would include things like smoking, drinking, illegal drugs, prostitution, and other “vice” type activities. I guess the “government penalties” would be referring to monetary punishments, withholding medical treatments (insurance companies would love that), possibly imposing/regulating very high (exorbitant) prices on things considered unhealthy in order to cut down on their use, and other possibilities. 2.) Or, would you say that living an unhealthy lifestyle, likely resulting in a LOT of eventual personal pain and suffering, should be punishment enough for unhealthy lifestyles? When people make bad choices in life, often in their youth where ignorance and immediate gratification takes them over, 3.) Should a society be obligated to help "fix" them, by way of tax money? Is that part of
Comments
Post a Comment