The flattened skull of the new Neanderthal remainsPhoto: Graeme Barker
New excavations at a well-known Neanderthal site have revealed a previously undiscovered Neanderthal skeleton, along with more evidence that these extinct hominins may have had “flower burials” for their dead.
In the 1950s, archaeologist Ralph Solecki uncovered Neanderthal remains and tools in Iraqi Kurdistan’s Shanidar Cave, a find extremely influential to our modern understanding of Neanderthals. One of the individuals, called Shanidar 4, was surrounded by clumps of pollen, and archaeologists wondered whether other Neanderthals had intentionally buried the body and placed flowers at its grave. Now, a new excavation at the cave using modern archaeological techniques has revealed another Neanderthal skeleton that seems to have been intentionally buried with plant matter.
“It’s very difficult to try to infer what [the Neanderthals] were actually thinking,” Emma Pomeroy, the study’s first author and an archaeologist at the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom, told Gizmodo. “But clearly there’s some meaningful thought process aside from just getting rid of a body that smells.”
Shanidar Cave is a large cave in the foothills of Iraqi Kurdistan’s Bradost Mountains. Here, from 1951 to 1960, Solecki’s team found 10 sets of Neanderthal remains, including men, women, and children. The discovery changed how people thought about Neanderthals; some appeared to have lived with severe disabilities, demonstrating social support and caring.
Though the Shanidar 4 remains were found near pollen grains, archaeologists questioned the theory that the group had given their dead a sort of funeral rite—perhaps the pollen was more a recent contamination (the archaeologists transported the excavated finds atop a taxi), or maybe rodents dragged the plants in, Pomeroy said. After all, if this group lived in a cave together, getting rid of a smelly corpse by burying it makes sense, without attaching any symbolic significance.
Shanidar CavePhoto: Graeme Barker
Then, in 2014, the Kurdish Regional Government invited researchers to once again excavate the cave, though the threat of ISIS delayed the project by a year. Researchers hoped to better understand how Solecki’s finds originally sat in the cave and determine the dates of the sediments around them. But they weren’t expecting to find a new Neanderthal right next to the original site of Shanidar 4.
The remains comprised the upper body of an individual, including a crushed skull, ribs, and left hand placed beneath the head, likely the same position of the individual at death. The researchers dated the remains at 45,000 to 55,000 years old, and based on the positioning, they guessed it probably belonged to one of the Neanderthals from Solecki’s excavations, perhaps Shanidar 6. They guessed that some of the duplicated bones between this find and Shanidar 6 could belong to another individual, according to the paper published in Antiquity.
These new remains had pollen surrounding them as well, and there were no rodent burrows near the bones to indicate that the plant material was dragged in. This preliminary evidence suggests, once again, that the Neanderthals in the cave intentionally buried their dead with flowers.
But the analysis has only just begun. Pomeroy told Gizmodo that her team hopes to combine techniques such as soil micromorphology—closely studying the sediment surrounding remains to better understand their context—as well as more advanced pollen analysis and even ancient DNA analysis.
We’ll never know for sure exactly what the Neanderthals were thinking when they buried their dead. But research increasingly suggest they were sensitive, artistic people, not hulking brutes. There are still many chapters of the Neanderthal story to uncover.
Here’s what Russia’s 2020 disinformation operations look like, according to two experts on social media and propaganda. By DARREN LINVILL & PATRICK WARREN Internet trolls don’t troll. Not the professionals at least. Professional trolls don’t go on social media to antagonize liberals or belittle conservatives. They are not narrow minded, drunk or angry. They don’t lack basic English language skills. They certainly aren’t “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds,” as the president once put it. Your stereotypical trolls do exist on social media, but the amateurs aren’t a threat to Western democracy. Professional trolls, on the other hand, are the tip of the spear in the new digital, ideological battleground. To combat the threat they pose, we must first understand them — and take them seriously. MORE: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russia-troll-2020-election-interference-twitter-916482/ P...
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term (Photo: Photos: Getty Images) Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President Donald Trump could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent Joe Biden when more votes are tallied. This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President Mike Pence , with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president. This...
Here is an interesting question in my list of philosophical questions: 1.) Should governments have penalties for those who live unhealthy lifestyles? A list of unhealthy lifestyles would include things like smoking, drinking, illegal drugs, prostitution, and other “vice” type activities. I guess the “government penalties” would be referring to monetary punishments, withholding medical treatments (insurance companies would love that), possibly imposing/regulating very high (exorbitant) prices on things considered unhealthy in order to cut down on their use, and other possibilities. 2.) Or, would you say that living an unhealthy lifestyle, likely resulting in a LOT of eventual personal pain and suffering, should be punishment enough for unhealthy lifestyles? When people make bad choices in life, often in their youth where ignorance and immediate gratification takes them over, 3.) Should a society be obligated to help "fix" them, by way of tax money? Is that part of...
Comments
Post a Comment