Scientists create living concrete from bacteria and sand Regenerating bricks are created from sand, gelatin, and bacteriaCement is one of the most widely used building materials in the world due to its low cost and longevity. While its usage is only increasing, its production is one of the world’s leading contributors of CO2emissions, with 2.8 gigatons produced each year.
Action to curb these emissions through alternative production methods or substitute materials are currently being explored by researchers around the world, though none have come close to reproducing cement’s desirable qualities.
“Microorganisms can be leveraged for multiple purposes in the design of [living building materials], including increasing the rate of manufacturing, imparting mechanical benefit, and sustaining biological function,” said the authors in the study.
The team used a 3D sand–hydrogel scaffold that they inoculated with Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 (Synechococcus) — a photosynthetic cyanobacterium that converts CO2 to sugars during photosynthesis. Cyanobacteria are well known to survive extreme environmental conditions, including high and low temperature, salinity, and humidity, making them ideal candidates for living materials.
A mold for shaping bricks made out of living materials. Image credit: CU Boulder College of Engineering and Applied Science
“We use photosynthetic cyanobacteria to biomineralize the scaffold, so it actually is really green. It looks like a Frankenstein-type material,” said senior author Wil Srubar, who heads the Living Materials Laboratory at the University of Colorado Boulder. “That’s exactly what we’re trying to create — something that stays alive.”
These new materials are also capable of being regenerated from one parent “brick” using temperature and humidity switches. This corresponds to cycles of incubation at 37 °C, followed by low-temperature storage, where the gelatin matrix solidifies and encapsulates the bacteria.
Splitting one brick in half and extending its shape using additional sand and hydrogel scaffolding, Sruber and his co-workers demonstrated the creation of eight new bricks (three successive generations) from a single parent. According to Sruber, this will no doubt shift the way in which we think about current manufacturing practices and how we re-use materials.
“From an engineering perspective, the responsiveness of [living building materials] to these temperature and humidity switches is opportune. Material systems that protect microorganisms with encapsulating gels or other solid media generally require physical damage to the encapsulant in order to trigger additional biomineralization,” the authors said. “While this approach may be appropriate for in situ crack sealing, it is challenging to elicit a uniform metabolic response from embedded microorganisms. By contrast, environmental switches can be applied uniformly to precisely control microbial activity.”
However, a trade-off exists between biological viability and mechanical performance because the gelatin gains its maximal strength when dehydrated and the bacteria requires humidity to function. A balance between these two factors was required for this class of living building material, but the researchers believe that the process could be optimized by exploring the use of additives to enhance bacteria tolerance to dry conditions.
Although this technology is still in its infancy and is not intended to completely replace cement completely, it represents a new frontier in material manufacturing: a new class of responsive materials “in which structural function is complemented by biological functions.”
“This is a material platform that sets the stage for brand new, exciting materials that can be engineered to interact and respond to their environments,” said Srubar. “We are just trying to bring building materials to life, and I think that is the nugget in this whole thing. We’re just scratching the surface and laying the foundation of a new discipline. The sky is the limit.”
Here’s what Russia’s 2020 disinformation operations look like, according to two experts on social media and propaganda. By DARREN LINVILL & PATRICK WARREN Internet trolls don’t troll. Not the professionals at least. Professional trolls don’t go on social media to antagonize liberals or belittle conservatives. They are not narrow minded, drunk or angry. They don’t lack basic English language skills. They certainly aren’t “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds,” as the president once put it. Your stereotypical trolls do exist on social media, but the amateurs aren’t a threat to Western democracy. Professional trolls, on the other hand, are the tip of the spear in the new digital, ideological battleground. To combat the threat they pose, we must first understand them — and take them seriously. MORE: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russia-troll-2020-election-interference-twitter-916482/ P...
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term (Photo: Photos: Getty Images) Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President Donald Trump could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent Joe Biden when more votes are tallied. This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President Mike Pence , with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president. This...
So, what is bluster? By definition: - to speak or act in a noisy, angry, or threatening way without saying anything important As good enough an explanation as any I guess, but it really doesn't say it all. Back when I was a kid, there was always that kid on the teams that would lose at whatever game it was and get mad while blaming someone else for the loss, even though they'd been a major part in the loss. So I naively assumed that bluster was only a sore loser thing. As I got older and worked I found out that it was also a tactic to try and scare others from fighting back. So a poker reference here, it's very similar to someone going "all in" right away to discourage anyone from calling the bet. Now, we see it quite often in politics, usually with doubling down if it's confronted. In politics as a tactic, it's meant to scare the politician's opponents, but also to distract from the other things the politician has failed to deliver and/or actually w...