Sarah Thomas, a 37-year-old cancer survivor, swims across the 21-mile English Channel. She said she was stung on the face by a jellyfish during her epic swim, in which she crisscrossed the channel four times, a journey that ended up being more than 130 miles because of the tides.
Jon Washer/AP
Sarah Thomas, an American ultramarathon swimmer, has just completed a swim that no other human on the planet has ever accomplished.
The 37-year-old from Colorado plunged into waters off the shore of Dover, England, in the wee hours of Sunday morning. Her goal: swim the entire length of the English Channel.
Then do it again.
And again.
And again.
Thomas completed the final leg of her swim at around 6:30 a.m. local time Tuesday in just over 54 hours— the first person to cross the channel four times without stopping.
In an interview with the BBC, Thomas said she was in disbelief that she had done it and was surprised by a group of well-wishers who were waiting for her on shore when she got out of the water.
She's done it
After treatment for breast cancer last year, Sarah Thomas has become the first person to swim across the Channel four times non-stop
Congratulations! #channelswimmer#sarahthomas
"I'm really just pretty numb," she said. "There was a lot of people on the beach to meet me and wish me well and it was really nice of them, but I feel just mostly stunned."
She also told the BBC that she planned to sleep the remainder of the day, adding: "I'm pretty tired right now."
Just a year ago, Thomas was completing treatment for breast cancer. In a Facebook post on Saturday, a day before starting her epic exploit, Thomas dedicated her swim to "all the Survivors out there."
"This is for those of us who have prayed for our lives, who have wondered with despair about what comes next, and have battled through pain and fear to overcome," she wrote. "This is for those of you just starting your cancer journey and those of you who are thriving with cancer kicked firmly into the past, and for everyone in between."
The Guardian points out that Thomas is not the first person to swim across the English Channel multiple times — four swimmers have crisscrossed it three times without stopping.
As the crow flies, Thomas' swim should have been approximately 80 miles long. But the journey ended up being more than 130 miles because of the tides, the Guardian reports.
The newspaper also says Thomas drank a carbohydrate-laden shake every half hour to keep her body replenished. Her mother, Becky Baxter, said the shake was "tied to a rope" and tossed to Thomas from a nearby boat where a crew was keeping a watchful eye on her.
As the crow flies, Thomas' record-setting swim four times across the English Channel should have been approximately 80 miles long. It ended up being more than 50 miles longer because of the pull of tides.
track.rs/ssthomas3; ESRI-National Geographic
"She drinks a third of that bottle in 10-15 seconds, and then she takes off again," Baxter said, according to the Guardian. "She is a freak of nature. She really had to dig deep to finish this. She could have quit many, many times. There were several obstacles, but she never quits."
Before Thomas' final leg, a member of her team posted on Facebook about water conditions in the channel at the time: "Dark, windy, and choppy conditions tonight for the final leg of the English Channel 4 way crossing."
And there were other obstacles. Thomas told the BBC that the salt water hurt her throat, mouth and tongue.
The currents on the last leg pushed her "all over," she told the broadcaster, adding: "I got stung in the face by a jellyfish. [The water] wasn't as cold as I thought it might be, but it was still chilly."
The official Twitter account for the Channel Swimming & Piloting Federation, the governing body for English Channel swimming, called Thomas "an absolute legend."
Congratulations to Sarah Thomas for successfully completing a 4-way historic crossing of the English Channel. An absolute legend! We'll have official confirmation of times shortly (I assume everyone needs a good sleep after that!)
Here’s what Russia’s 2020 disinformation operations look like, according to two experts on social media and propaganda. By DARREN LINVILL & PATRICK WARREN Internet trolls don’t troll. Not the professionals at least. Professional trolls don’t go on social media to antagonize liberals or belittle conservatives. They are not narrow minded, drunk or angry. They don’t lack basic English language skills. They certainly aren’t “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds,” as the president once put it. Your stereotypical trolls do exist on social media, but the amateurs aren’t a threat to Western democracy. Professional trolls, on the other hand, are the tip of the spear in the new digital, ideological battleground. To combat the threat they pose, we must first understand them — and take them seriously. MORE: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russia-troll-2020-election-interference-twitter-916482/ P...
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term (Photo: Photos: Getty Images) Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President Donald Trump could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent Joe Biden when more votes are tallied. This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President Mike Pence , with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president. This...
So, what is bluster? By definition: - to speak or act in a noisy, angry, or threatening way without saying anything important As good enough an explanation as any I guess, but it really doesn't say it all. Back when I was a kid, there was always that kid on the teams that would lose at whatever game it was and get mad while blaming someone else for the loss, even though they'd been a major part in the loss. So I naively assumed that bluster was only a sore loser thing. As I got older and worked I found out that it was also a tactic to try and scare others from fighting back. So a poker reference here, it's very similar to someone going "all in" right away to discourage anyone from calling the bet. Now, we see it quite often in politics, usually with doubling down if it's confronted. In politics as a tactic, it's meant to scare the politician's opponents, but also to distract from the other things the politician has failed to deliver and/or actually w...
