Using the right amount of…

No, not salt, sugar, mustard, soy sauce or any other spice or condiment.  Nor am I talking about social distancing, credit card use, caution or hair gel.  I’m talking about the right amount of… cuss words.

You know, otherwise known as swearing, cursing, potty-mouth. 

How do we know what is the right amount of cuss words?  When is it okay, not okay to use them?

  • Never cuss.  It makes you look bad
  • Only use them in jest, or to get a cheap laugh, but never in anger
  • Only cuss when you’re really really angry, then self-permission and blessing granted
  • Cuss all you want, just don’t take the Lord’s name in vain
  • Do it as long as you don’t use them in front of mom or the kids
  • Use them all you want, I don’t give a shit
  • Cuss words should only be used in the movies, and for effect
  • Ladies should never cuss.  It’s proof that they are not ladies
  • Don’t use them so much that they become meaningless (non-impactful)
  • Try to limit yourself to once per week, then pony-up a dollar to your curse-jar for each event over that, until next week comes
  • Try to substitute euphemisms as much as possible, like shoot, freakin’, darn, unless absolutely necessary
  • [You cuss limits here]

Tell us how you feel about cuss words.  What does your cuss-o-meter say?

(by PrimalSoup)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

That Uplifting Tweet You Just Shared? A Russian Troll Sent It

Image
Here’s what Russia’s 2020 disinformation operations look like, according to two experts on social media and propaganda. By   DARREN LINVILL   &   PATRICK WARREN Internet trolls don’t troll. Not the professionals at least. Professional trolls don’t go on social media to antagonize liberals or belittle conservatives. They are not narrow minded, drunk or angry. They don’t lack basic English language skills. They certainly aren’t  “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds,”  as the president once put it. Your stereotypical trolls do exist on social media, but the amateurs aren’t a threat to Western democracy. Professional trolls, on the other hand, are the tip of the spear in the new digital, ideological battleground. To combat the threat they pose, we must first understand them — and take them seriously. MORE: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russia-troll-2020-election-interference-twitter-916482/ Posted by Jamie B.
Read more

The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term

Image
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term   (Photo: Photos: Getty Images) Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President  Donald Trump  could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent  Joe Biden  when more votes are tallied.  This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President  Mike Pence , with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president. This is arguably the most likely of th
Read more

Philosophical Question #14 – Lifestyle Choices

Image
Here is an interesting question in my list of philosophical questions: 1.) Should governments have penalties for those who live unhealthy lifestyles? A list of unhealthy lifestyles would include things like smoking, drinking, illegal drugs, prostitution, and other “vice” type activities. I guess the “government penalties” would be referring to monetary punishments, withholding medical treatments (insurance companies would love that), possibly imposing/regulating very high (exorbitant) prices on things considered unhealthy in order to cut down on their use, and other possibilities. 2.) Or, would you say that living an unhealthy lifestyle, likely resulting in a LOT of eventual personal pain and suffering, should be punishment enough for unhealthy lifestyles? When people make bad choices in life, often in their youth where ignorance and immediate gratification takes them over,  3.) Should a society be obligated to help "fix" them, by way of tax money?   Is that part of
Read more