It's all a matter of taste, ain't it?

 Whether disgusting, disturbing or just plain vile, there have been some awful movies in movie history. In fact some are SO horrible they have to be seen so you can brag you saw them. Amirite?

Now it depends also on who you ask, so different rating sites rate really horrible movies by different standards. Example...

https://www.thetoptens.com/movies/most-disturbing-movies/

Lists as the worst being SALO or The 120 Days of Sodom

As one watcher described it: Watching this movie was perhaps the most unpleasant two hours of my life, but those were two hours that I feel were well spent.

Meanwhile, another site:

While some of the movies on this list have dealt at least partially with some kind of body horror, 2010’s A Serbian Film distances itself from the previous entries by being simply heinous in both concept and execution. From child abuse to necrophilia, there are all sorts of evil acts and unspeakable crimes committed in this movie’s plot, which was the reason for it being banned in numerous countries.

https://www.fortressofsolitude.co.za/the-10-most-disgusting-movies-ever-made/

Nearly every site does include:

A movie so violent and deranged that it had to be banned in over 50 countries, there are many reasons why the 1980’s Cannibal Holocaust could be considered one of the vilest and most disgusting movies ever made.

Believe it or not I even found sites that listed movies like American Psycho or Last Tango in Paris among the most disgusting. Really! Or how about BS movies like 2000 Mules or Death Of A Nation?

OK, without further ado - your turn! Most disturbing or vile or whatever movie or movies (you can pick more than one) that YOU have ever seen.


"Caligula is sickening, utterly worthless, shameful trash."






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

That Uplifting Tweet You Just Shared? A Russian Troll Sent It

Image
Here’s what Russia’s 2020 disinformation operations look like, according to two experts on social media and propaganda. By   DARREN LINVILL   &   PATRICK WARREN Internet trolls don’t troll. Not the professionals at least. Professional trolls don’t go on social media to antagonize liberals or belittle conservatives. They are not narrow minded, drunk or angry. They don’t lack basic English language skills. They certainly aren’t  “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds,”  as the president once put it. Your stereotypical trolls do exist on social media, but the amateurs aren’t a threat to Western democracy. Professional trolls, on the other hand, are the tip of the spear in the new digital, ideological battleground. To combat the threat they pose, we must first understand them — and take them seriously. MORE: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russia-troll-2020-election-interference-twitter-916482/ Posted by Jamie B.
Read more

The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term

Image
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term   (Photo: Photos: Getty Images) Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President  Donald Trump  could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent  Joe Biden  when more votes are tallied.  This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President  Mike Pence , with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president. This is arguably the most likely of th
Read more

Philosophical Question #14 – Lifestyle Choices

Image
Here is an interesting question in my list of philosophical questions: 1.) Should governments have penalties for those who live unhealthy lifestyles? A list of unhealthy lifestyles would include things like smoking, drinking, illegal drugs, prostitution, and other “vice” type activities. I guess the “government penalties” would be referring to monetary punishments, withholding medical treatments (insurance companies would love that), possibly imposing/regulating very high (exorbitant) prices on things considered unhealthy in order to cut down on their use, and other possibilities. 2.) Or, would you say that living an unhealthy lifestyle, likely resulting in a LOT of eventual personal pain and suffering, should be punishment enough for unhealthy lifestyles? When people make bad choices in life, often in their youth where ignorance and immediate gratification takes them over,  3.) Should a society be obligated to help "fix" them, by way of tax money?   Is that part of
Read more