Santa Persona vs. God Persona… 😵

At what point do children stop believing in Santa (the actual person, not the sentiment/idea)?  I’d guess maybe around 10 years old, though kids are different today than they were back in my childhood days.  We were still pretty “innocent minded” back in the ‘50s, when I was 10ish.  

Regarding the Santa persona, ideas in children eventually crop up like:

  • “How does Santa and his reindeer fly all around the world in one night?” 
  • “Why is Santa on every street corner during Christmastime, ringing a bell and asking for money?” 
  • “How does Santa eat all those cookies and drink all that milk that children leave him and not get sick?” 
  • “How does fat Santa get down and back up a chimney without getting stuck?”
  • “How do all those presents fit in Santa’s sleigh?”
  • “Why is there a sales tag on that present Santa left me under the tree?” 😮
  • “Etc.”

Yes, curious questions like these are bound to happen for the savvy/thinking kid.  At some point, incredulity sets in.  Or, at least it should, if they are (I’ll call it) “normal.”

Now let’s do an interesting comparison.  (I’m braced for impact, so let me have it.)

I think most people in the world, or at least in my neck of the woods (the U.S.), even many here on this blog, believe in God the Omni (granted, Gods vary with religions, but the “omni-idea” seems to apply across the board).

Like Santa, people have only read about their God in books; seen pictures of “Him” by way of His Son, Jesus; know that God is good, loving, well-wishing; etc., etc., and etc.  In other words, like Santa, it’s all hearsay with no categorical, first-hand proof of the God Persona; just so-called "circumstantial evidence."

But the hearsay has taken hold… in spades.  It’s taught from birth to death, passed down from generation to generation, pretty much with no or few questions asked, and by only those who dare.

So, in that way, I actually can’t help but compare the inconsistency of the child’s eventual “Santa conundrum resolution” (rejection) versus the adult’s eventual "God conundrum resolution” (acceptance).  I think there’s something fantastically incongruent/non-sequitur going on there.  What is it?

Q1: Like kids and Santa, shouldn't there come a point in life where God is, at minimum, questioned? Yes/No/IDK/Other

Q2: After review of the vastly missing evidence, and God is still accepted, what does that say about the believing person?  Hope-related, fear-related, I give up-related (i.e., too much work to pursue the conundrum), Other-related?

I ask in all sincerity.  What’s going on between the “no longer accepting of Santa,” but “still accepting of God" situation?”  Help me understand this.  It's fine (with me) to believe in [your] God, I just want to know the "why" of it.  Give as much detail as you can.

(by PrimalSoup)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

That Uplifting Tweet You Just Shared? A Russian Troll Sent It

Image
Here’s what Russia’s 2020 disinformation operations look like, according to two experts on social media and propaganda. By   DARREN LINVILL   &   PATRICK WARREN Internet trolls don’t troll. Not the professionals at least. Professional trolls don’t go on social media to antagonize liberals or belittle conservatives. They are not narrow minded, drunk or angry. They don’t lack basic English language skills. They certainly aren’t  “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds,”  as the president once put it. Your stereotypical trolls do exist on social media, but the amateurs aren’t a threat to Western democracy. Professional trolls, on the other hand, are the tip of the spear in the new digital, ideological battleground. To combat the threat they pose, we must first understand them — and take them seriously. MORE: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russia-troll-2020-election-interference-twitter-916482/ Posted by Jamie B.
Read more

The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term

Image
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term   (Photo: Photos: Getty Images) Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President  Donald Trump  could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent  Joe Biden  when more votes are tallied.  This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President  Mike Pence , with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president. This is arguably the most likely of th
Read more

Philosophical Question #14 – Lifestyle Choices

Image
Here is an interesting question in my list of philosophical questions: 1.) Should governments have penalties for those who live unhealthy lifestyles? A list of unhealthy lifestyles would include things like smoking, drinking, illegal drugs, prostitution, and other “vice” type activities. I guess the “government penalties” would be referring to monetary punishments, withholding medical treatments (insurance companies would love that), possibly imposing/regulating very high (exorbitant) prices on things considered unhealthy in order to cut down on their use, and other possibilities. 2.) Or, would you say that living an unhealthy lifestyle, likely resulting in a LOT of eventual personal pain and suffering, should be punishment enough for unhealthy lifestyles? When people make bad choices in life, often in their youth where ignorance and immediate gratification takes them over,  3.) Should a society be obligated to help "fix" them, by way of tax money?   Is that part of
Read more