Potty humor at whiskey legend’s expense gives high court a chuckle

 I am sure I did a thread on this story a while back, so consider this an update. 


Arguments over a waggish dog toy had some justices questioning their sense of humor. 




WASHINGTON (CN) — The normally sedate Supreme Court broke into fits of laughter on Wednesday while reviewing a toymaker’s spoof on Jack Daniel's Tennessee Whiskey. 

Advertised as “The Old No.2 on your Tennessee carpet,” Bad Spaniels Silly Squeaker dog toy advertises “43% Poo by Vol.” and that it is “100% Smelly.” For Jack Daniel's, even the whiff of association to its Old No. 7 Brand was enough to begin litigation that landed on the high court steps this morning.

It appeared likely the court might decide the case on narrow grounds, but Justice Neil Gorsuch seemed to endorse another option. The Trump appointee said the Rogers test wasn’t ideal because it forced judges to evaluate art. 

“Judges make for pretty lousy art critics,” Gorsuch said. 

The suit originated in 2014 when Jack Daniel’s attempted to force VIP to remove all Bad Spaniels toys from the market. Leaning on protections for speech under parody, VIP requested a declaratory judgment that its toy did not infringe on trademark rights. 

Ruling in favor of Jack Daniel’s, a federal judge said the toy should not be protected by the First Amendment because it is sold as a commercial product. A unanimous panel on the Ninth Circuit reversed, sending the case back to the district court where VIP's First Amendment protections prevailed. The Ninth Circuit affirmed on appeal, sending the case to the justices. 

https://www.courthousenews.com/potty-humor-at-whiskey-legends-expense-gives-high-court-a-chuckle/




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

That Uplifting Tweet You Just Shared? A Russian Troll Sent It

The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term

When Life Hands You Lemons