AN IDEA THAT MIGHT FLY?

 OK, bear with me here. The media has been musing about this possibility (though we all know it won't happen).

https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/verify/government-verify/it-is-possible-for-a-vice-president-to-be-nominated-to-the-supreme-court/536-4097e53b-fba8-4311-ae60-ea21b24709ab

Is Kamala qualified? Legally, yes:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris#:~:text=In%202003%2C%20she%20was%20elected,and%20re%2Delected%20in%202014.&text=Harris%20defeated%20Loretta%20Sanchez%20in,in%20the%20United%20States%20Senate.

Mind you, the idea is being mostly floated by Rightwing media, for obvious reasons. BUT is the idea really THAT insane?

None other than Michael Smerconish was musing about this possibility this morning on XM radio.

His idea: kill two birds with one stone.

Kamala IS a woman of color, she has the credentials, and though the Repubs would fight tooth and nail, the Dems might have the votes to confirm her. (I know, depends on Manchin and Sinema)

THE ADDED BONUS: Biden gets to unload an unpopular VP and get a new one in time for the mid-terms.

How about:

Pete Buttigieg (as long as Biden doesn't keep insisting on having a woman of color as VP)

Tammy Duckworth (if  Biden does insist, and this would be a popular pick)

Joe Manchin (imagine the headlines!)

Deb Haaland (our first Native American VP) 

SO FOLKS: have some fun with this one and answer two questions:

Would it be a good idea to name Kamala Harris to the SCOTUS?

If it were to happen (I know, not going to, but play along anyways), who would YOU like to see as a new VP?




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

That Uplifting Tweet You Just Shared? A Russian Troll Sent It

Image
Here’s what Russia’s 2020 disinformation operations look like, according to two experts on social media and propaganda. By   DARREN LINVILL   &   PATRICK WARREN Internet trolls don’t troll. Not the professionals at least. Professional trolls don’t go on social media to antagonize liberals or belittle conservatives. They are not narrow minded, drunk or angry. They don’t lack basic English language skills. They certainly aren’t  “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds,”  as the president once put it. Your stereotypical trolls do exist on social media, but the amateurs aren’t a threat to Western democracy. Professional trolls, on the other hand, are the tip of the spear in the new digital, ideological battleground. To combat the threat they pose, we must first understand them — and take them seriously. MORE: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russia-troll-2020-election-interference-twitter-916482/ Posted by Jamie B.
Read more

The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term

Image
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term   (Photo: Photos: Getty Images) Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President  Donald Trump  could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent  Joe Biden  when more votes are tallied.  This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President  Mike Pence , with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president. This is arguably the most likely of th
Read more

Philosophical Question #14 – Lifestyle Choices

Image
Here is an interesting question in my list of philosophical questions: 1.) Should governments have penalties for those who live unhealthy lifestyles? A list of unhealthy lifestyles would include things like smoking, drinking, illegal drugs, prostitution, and other “vice” type activities. I guess the “government penalties” would be referring to monetary punishments, withholding medical treatments (insurance companies would love that), possibly imposing/regulating very high (exorbitant) prices on things considered unhealthy in order to cut down on their use, and other possibilities. 2.) Or, would you say that living an unhealthy lifestyle, likely resulting in a LOT of eventual personal pain and suffering, should be punishment enough for unhealthy lifestyles? When people make bad choices in life, often in their youth where ignorance and immediate gratification takes them over,  3.) Should a society be obligated to help "fix" them, by way of tax money?   Is that part of
Read more