A Mississippi church was burnt to the ground and a message was spray-painted on the ground.
A Mississippi church was burned to the ground not long after drawing backlash for violating a stay-at-home order and holding in-person services.
The church had sued the city of Holly Springs over the measures, but a judge accused the church of having "insufficient respect for the enormity of the health crisis which the COVID-19 pandemic presents."
Local authorities believe the church fire was caused by arson.
A disturbing message was spray-painted on the ground in front of the church: "Bet you stay home now you hypokrites."
A Mississippi church that drew ire for violating the city of Holly Springs' stay-at-home order was burnt down early Wednesday morning, and a disturbing message was spray-painted on the ground: "Bet you stay home now you hypokrites."
The Marshall County Sheriff Department told local media outlets that investigators believe the incident was arson, due to evidence found at the scene.
The First Pentecostal Church was at the center of a lawsuit over lockdown measures aim at reducing the spread of the coronavirus. Authorities cited the church's pastor, Jerry Waldrop, for holding an in-person service on Easter despite the city's order against doing so, according to The New York Times.
The church sued the city, but a judge refused to block the stay-at-home order, noting that Holly Springs had permitted churches to conduct drive-in services, which would allow for social distancing.
Judge Michael Mills said in his opinion that the church was "determined to push the legal envelope even further" and was "proceeding in an excessively reckless and cavalier manner and with insufficient respect for the enormity of the health crisis which the COVID-19 pandemic presents."
Mills continued: "Is avoiding the inconveniences associated with drive-in church services worth risking the very lives of their fellow congregants and other members of the community? Unfortunately, [the church] and its members appear to have decided that the answer to this question is 'yes.'"
In the wake of the suspected arson, Waldrop told Fox 13 Memphis that the loss of the building wouldn't stop the churchgoers from worshipping together.
"We are going to keep the faith, and we're going to keep doing what we have always done, and maybe not on this location," he said. "I'll get with our faithful people, and maybe we'll rent a building or whatever we need to do for the time being.
Here’s what Russia’s 2020 disinformation operations look like, according to two experts on social media and propaganda. By DARREN LINVILL & PATRICK WARREN Internet trolls don’t troll. Not the professionals at least. Professional trolls don’t go on social media to antagonize liberals or belittle conservatives. They are not narrow minded, drunk or angry. They don’t lack basic English language skills. They certainly aren’t “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds,” as the president once put it. Your stereotypical trolls do exist on social media, but the amateurs aren’t a threat to Western democracy. Professional trolls, on the other hand, are the tip of the spear in the new digital, ideological battleground. To combat the threat they pose, we must first understand them — and take them seriously. MORE: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russia-troll-2020-election-interference-twitter-916482/ Posted by Jamie B.
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term (Photo: Photos: Getty Images) Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President Donald Trump could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent Joe Biden when more votes are tallied. This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President Mike Pence , with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president. This is arguably the most likely of th
Here is an interesting question in my list of philosophical questions: 1.) Should governments have penalties for those who live unhealthy lifestyles? A list of unhealthy lifestyles would include things like smoking, drinking, illegal drugs, prostitution, and other “vice” type activities. I guess the “government penalties” would be referring to monetary punishments, withholding medical treatments (insurance companies would love that), possibly imposing/regulating very high (exorbitant) prices on things considered unhealthy in order to cut down on their use, and other possibilities. 2.) Or, would you say that living an unhealthy lifestyle, likely resulting in a LOT of eventual personal pain and suffering, should be punishment enough for unhealthy lifestyles? When people make bad choices in life, often in their youth where ignorance and immediate gratification takes them over, 3.) Should a society be obligated to help "fix" them, by way of tax money? Is that part of
Comments
Post a Comment