open discussion about political language

 Them Republicans, they are deplorable, Fascist, racist.

Them Democrats, they are vermin, woke, groomers.

Yes yes, bad language has always existed. However, a different take.........

Trump’s ‘vermin’ comment was vile, but Democrats should also stop dehumanizing opponents

If you’re searching for a leader who will call us to the angels of our better natures, we can abandon all hope, ye who enter here, or we can seek better among those who wish to lead. Or insist on it.


Question: Fight fire with fire, or take the higher ground? Are OUR words like deplorable NOT as heinous as Trump's use of Vermin, so it's ok?

Collective demonization certainly isn’t something new in politics, particularly recently. When Hillary Clinton identified half of Trump supporters as a “basket of deplorables,” she was playing on the same field as Trump and his “vermin” comment. When President Joe Biden blithely labels many Trump supporters as “semi-fascist,” he’s swimming in similar mire.

Anyone who condemns Trump’s words, but agrees with Clinton and Biden, isn’t acting on principle, but politics. And vice versa. As English writer and philosopher Aldous Huxley said, “The propagandist's purpose is to make one set of people forget that certain other sets of people are human.”

Why can’t we follow Lincoln’s lead and show ‘charity for all’?

America deserves better. Rather, it needs better.

Near the end of the Civil War, the most severe threat in its history to America’s survival,  Republican President Abraham Lincoln in his second inaugural address famously and historically called out to the South and North alike, “With malice toward none, with charity for all.”

Hey, this is not Snowy's argument but that of.......

George Korda is a political analyst for WATE-TV, hosts “State Your Case”

https://www.knoxnews.com/story/opinion/columnists/2023/12/05/trump-vermin-mccarthyism-political-enemies-biden-hillary-clinton-abraham-lincoln/71805737007/

Does Mr. Korda have a point or is he making a false equivalency? After all, many have argued it is time to "fight fire with fire."


WHAT SAY YOU?



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

That Uplifting Tweet You Just Shared? A Russian Troll Sent It

Image
Here’s what Russia’s 2020 disinformation operations look like, according to two experts on social media and propaganda. By   DARREN LINVILL   &   PATRICK WARREN Internet trolls don’t troll. Not the professionals at least. Professional trolls don’t go on social media to antagonize liberals or belittle conservatives. They are not narrow minded, drunk or angry. They don’t lack basic English language skills. They certainly aren’t  “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds,”  as the president once put it. Your stereotypical trolls do exist on social media, but the amateurs aren’t a threat to Western democracy. Professional trolls, on the other hand, are the tip of the spear in the new digital, ideological battleground. To combat the threat they pose, we must first understand them — and take them seriously. MORE: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russia-troll-2020-election-interference-twitter-916482/ Posted by Jamie B.
Read more

The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term

Image
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term   (Photo: Photos: Getty Images) Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President  Donald Trump  could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent  Joe Biden  when more votes are tallied.  This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President  Mike Pence , with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president. This is arguably the most likely of th
Read more

Philosophical Question #14 – Lifestyle Choices

Image
Here is an interesting question in my list of philosophical questions: 1.) Should governments have penalties for those who live unhealthy lifestyles? A list of unhealthy lifestyles would include things like smoking, drinking, illegal drugs, prostitution, and other “vice” type activities. I guess the “government penalties” would be referring to monetary punishments, withholding medical treatments (insurance companies would love that), possibly imposing/regulating very high (exorbitant) prices on things considered unhealthy in order to cut down on their use, and other possibilities. 2.) Or, would you say that living an unhealthy lifestyle, likely resulting in a LOT of eventual personal pain and suffering, should be punishment enough for unhealthy lifestyles? When people make bad choices in life, often in their youth where ignorance and immediate gratification takes them over,  3.) Should a society be obligated to help "fix" them, by way of tax money?   Is that part of
Read more