flogging a dead horse

Hello there, I hope no one posts a picture of a dead horse, or PETA or some horse lover or animal lover will complain about inappropriate content!

: to keep talking about a subject that has already been discussed or decided.
: to waste time and effort trying to do something that is impossible.

SNOWFLAKE'S DEFINITION: Ad Nauseam.


On discussion boards and online forums and yup, in real life, there are some people who have to keep arguing a point way past the time it has been flogged.
You made your point, they made theirs. BUT............ they can't leave it alone, they will keep at you till you agree to their point.

What do you do? Tell 'em drop it? Ignore 'em? Tell 'em about the dead horse?

Hillary scandals, Hunter Biden scandals, are they dead horses? Or........still relevant for discussion?

Doesn't have to be political either, some dead horses are over the most mundane things. YES, I have come across people who will argue about a sport, a social issue, oh H E double LL, will even argue about a neighbor or the guy (or gal) down the street, because they have a POINT they want to make. 

What is a polite person to do? Tell 'em to get a life? Or hear them out till they run out of gas? It's a dilemma, isn't it?

So, to make a long boring assertation short: How do YOU respond to a flogger of dead horses? What advice would you give on how to deal with a flogger? 

AND can you give any examples, maybe from your personal life, or from your journey through online forums, of floggers you have encountered?

Happy Monday BTW.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

That Uplifting Tweet You Just Shared? A Russian Troll Sent It

Image
Here’s what Russia’s 2020 disinformation operations look like, according to two experts on social media and propaganda. By   DARREN LINVILL   &   PATRICK WARREN Internet trolls don’t troll. Not the professionals at least. Professional trolls don’t go on social media to antagonize liberals or belittle conservatives. They are not narrow minded, drunk or angry. They don’t lack basic English language skills. They certainly aren’t  “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds,”  as the president once put it. Your stereotypical trolls do exist on social media, but the amateurs aren’t a threat to Western democracy. Professional trolls, on the other hand, are the tip of the spear in the new digital, ideological battleground. To combat the threat they pose, we must first understand them — and take them seriously. MORE: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russia-troll-2020-election-interference-twitter-916482/ Posted by Jamie B.
Read more

The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term

Image
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term   (Photo: Photos: Getty Images) Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President  Donald Trump  could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent  Joe Biden  when more votes are tallied.  This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President  Mike Pence , with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president. This is arguably the most likely of th
Read more

Philosophical Question #14 – Lifestyle Choices

Image
Here is an interesting question in my list of philosophical questions: 1.) Should governments have penalties for those who live unhealthy lifestyles? A list of unhealthy lifestyles would include things like smoking, drinking, illegal drugs, prostitution, and other “vice” type activities. I guess the “government penalties” would be referring to monetary punishments, withholding medical treatments (insurance companies would love that), possibly imposing/regulating very high (exorbitant) prices on things considered unhealthy in order to cut down on their use, and other possibilities. 2.) Or, would you say that living an unhealthy lifestyle, likely resulting in a LOT of eventual personal pain and suffering, should be punishment enough for unhealthy lifestyles? When people make bad choices in life, often in their youth where ignorance and immediate gratification takes them over,  3.) Should a society be obligated to help "fix" them, by way of tax money?   Is that part of
Read more