Australia passes law to force Facebook and Google to pay for news

Australia passes law to force Facebook and Google to pay for news 


Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison.

Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison.

The Parliament of Australia has passed a final version of legislation designed to force Google and Facebook to pay to link to news articles. The passage of the News Media Bargaining Code marks the end of a contentious months-long negotiation between the Australian government and the two technology giants—which are singled out in the code.

Google and Facebook have long argued that they shouldn't have to pay a dime to link to news articles, since the links send valuable traffic to news sites. Over the last decade, Google has successfully beaten back efforts to undermine the principle of free linking.

But over the last couple of years, governments in Australia and Europe have become more determined to force American technology giants to financially support their domestic news industries. In 2019, the European Parliament created a new "neighboring right" giving news sites the right to control the use of "snippets" in search results, and French regulators made it clearthat Google wasn't allowed to simply stop showing snippets—Google needed to cough up some cash.

The initial version of the Australian law was even more aggressive. It not only required tech giants to negotiate with news sites, it proposed a baseball-style arbitration process where each party (an Australian news publisher and a technology giant, respectively) would put forward a proposal, and then an independent arbitrator would decide which proposal was more "reasonable." This was widely seen as increasing the bargaining power of the news sites.

In January, Google threatened to shut down its Australian search engine if the law went into effect. Last week Facebook went even further, blocking users from sharing any Australian news articles. Microsoft seized on the opportunity to undermine its rivals, loudly endorsing the Australian approach and supporting the concept of paying for news content.

Google and Facebook are opening their wallets

After several days of intense bargaining, Facebook and Australia reached a deal that let both of them save face. Facebook agreed to re-enable sharing of news articles. In exchange, the Australian government allowed Facebook to opt out of the forced arbitration process if it could convince the government that it had already "made a significant contribution to the sustainability of the Australian news industry through reaching commercial agreements with news media businesses." Google and Facebook have both been busily inking deals with Australian media companies in an effort to show that more coercive measures were unnecessary.

The revised law gives tech companies a longer window of time to reach voluntary deals before they're forced into an arbitration process.

While these changes were tactical gains for Facebook and Google relative to Australia's harsh original proposal, it's clear that the tech giants have abandoned their earlier stance that they shouldn't have to pay at all. At this point, there seems to be little prospect that Google will be able to resist similar proposals in EU member states, though they may get deals watered down at the margin.

Canada and other countries are considering similar legislation. Facebook and Google are rushing to preempt those laws by striking voluntary deals with news organizations around the world.

In the long run, this could leave the United States as an outlier among developed countries. As far as we know, there are no serious proposals to adopt the Australian model here. The courts could strike down such a requirement on First Amendment grounds. And constitutional issues aside, it's hard to imagine the US Congress making the necessary changes to US copyright and antitrust laws.

MMW

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

That Uplifting Tweet You Just Shared? A Russian Troll Sent It

Image
Here’s what Russia’s 2020 disinformation operations look like, according to two experts on social media and propaganda. By   DARREN LINVILL   &   PATRICK WARREN Internet trolls don’t troll. Not the professionals at least. Professional trolls don’t go on social media to antagonize liberals or belittle conservatives. They are not narrow minded, drunk or angry. They don’t lack basic English language skills. They certainly aren’t  “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds,”  as the president once put it. Your stereotypical trolls do exist on social media, but the amateurs aren’t a threat to Western democracy. Professional trolls, on the other hand, are the tip of the spear in the new digital, ideological battleground. To combat the threat they pose, we must first understand them — and take them seriously. MORE: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russia-troll-2020-election-interference-twitter-916482/ P...
Read more

The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term

Image
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term   (Photo: Photos: Getty Images) Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President  Donald Trump  could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent  Joe Biden  when more votes are tallied.  This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President  Mike Pence , with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president. This...
Read more

When Life Hands You Lemons

Image
 It's like this folks: sometimes your mind goes blank. Happens more than usual with me of course. Take this forum for instance. I wanted to post something today and couldn't think of a topic. At least not a non-sexual one and we know sexual ones lately have been frowned upon.  Then along comes one of our regulars and complains about something. Well, they might not say it was a complaint, just an observation, but it was a complaint. A minor one. It has something to do about being able to make something out of nothing. Sort of like me this morning, how to make a thread out of an empty head? But they (notice I am using the correct pronoun, not saying he or she), by what they said got me thinking. What I thought was: Not sure if that is the actual saying, if I remember correctly, I remember the saying going something like this: Umm, no, I don't think the saying I am thinking of goes that way either, maybe ONE of you good folks can remind me how the saying goes. Either way, when...
Read more