Outraged customers call for a boycott of a politically correct cafe serving 'gender neutral' gingerbread 'people'

  • A politically correct cafe is selling 'gender neutral person gingerbread cookies' 
  • A gingerbread man dates back to the 15th century and is a Christmas staple
  • Cafe The Tannery, in Auckland, New Zealand, felt the name was outdated
A cafe has sparked a heated debate by removing gingerbread men from its menu, replacing it with 'gingerbread gender neutral person' instead.
A gingerbread man biscuit is a Christmas staple around the globe and dates back to the 15th century. 
However, a cafe named The Tannery, in Auckland, New Zealand, changed the name to be more inclusive.
Owner Andre Cettina told Stuff the name change after a number of customers questioned why they had been called gingerbread men in the first place. 
'It started off a bit tongue-in-cheek, but it's actually become a focal point and started a bit of a discussion at the counter with a lot of people taking photos,' she said.
'It used to be that 90 per cent of the time we sold [the gingerbread biscuits], it was to kids. There's a lot more people buying them now, which is quite funny,' she said. 
Some customers were upset at removing the gender from the gingerbread snack. 
'PC gone mad, always been ginger bread man, why change now. It's a biscuit, not a living creature. I find this all so sad,' one person wrote. 
'This ridiculous, PC gone mad, what's next, the world's gone bonkers,' wrote another.
'Boycott them just for their gross stupidity,' another wrote.
The New Zealand cafe is not the first to change the name of gingerbread men.

In 2018, the coffee shop at the Scottish parliament changed the name of the biscuit as well.  
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7663431/New-Zealand-cafe-selling-gingerbread-people-inclusive.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

That Uplifting Tweet You Just Shared? A Russian Troll Sent It

Image
Here’s what Russia’s 2020 disinformation operations look like, according to two experts on social media and propaganda. By   DARREN LINVILL   &   PATRICK WARREN Internet trolls don’t troll. Not the professionals at least. Professional trolls don’t go on social media to antagonize liberals or belittle conservatives. They are not narrow minded, drunk or angry. They don’t lack basic English language skills. They certainly aren’t  “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds,”  as the president once put it. Your stereotypical trolls do exist on social media, but the amateurs aren’t a threat to Western democracy. Professional trolls, on the other hand, are the tip of the spear in the new digital, ideological battleground. To combat the threat they pose, we must first understand them — and take them seriously. MORE: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russia-troll-2020-election-interference-twitter-916482/ Posted by Jamie B.
Read more

The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term

Image
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term   (Photo: Photos: Getty Images) Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President  Donald Trump  could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent  Joe Biden  when more votes are tallied.  This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President  Mike Pence , with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president. This is arguably the most likely of th
Read more

Philosophical Question #14 – Lifestyle Choices

Image
Here is an interesting question in my list of philosophical questions: 1.) Should governments have penalties for those who live unhealthy lifestyles? A list of unhealthy lifestyles would include things like smoking, drinking, illegal drugs, prostitution, and other “vice” type activities. I guess the “government penalties” would be referring to monetary punishments, withholding medical treatments (insurance companies would love that), possibly imposing/regulating very high (exorbitant) prices on things considered unhealthy in order to cut down on their use, and other possibilities. 2.) Or, would you say that living an unhealthy lifestyle, likely resulting in a LOT of eventual personal pain and suffering, should be punishment enough for unhealthy lifestyles? When people make bad choices in life, often in their youth where ignorance and immediate gratification takes them over,  3.) Should a society be obligated to help "fix" them, by way of tax money?   Is that part of
Read more