Jobs for All Manifesto

"[On the one hand,] giving priority to immediate reforms can lead straight into the mire of capitalist politics where principles have no place and everything has its price. On the other hand, insisting on revolutionary purity can lead to isolation and irrelevance. It seems that what is needed is a program directed toward an intermediate goal which both rejects the existing social order and at the same time is attainable without overthrowing it.
—Leo Huberman and Paul M. Sweezy, “Reform and Revolution,”
Monthly Review 20, no.2 (June, 1968) p.3
At a time when a mass movement for fundamental structural social change has begun to grow, the choice of focus among the many possible demands for particular needed changes poses a major problem. And today, for the first time since the late sixties, such a movement is recognizably underway in the United States.
As an immediate demand, the growing movement for a Federal guarantee of a decent socially useful job has much to recommend it.  Dissatisfaction with demeaning and exploitative shitjobs is universal among an entire generation. If a guaranteed socially useful job at a liveable wage were available (think of the WPA programs of the New Deal), the cost would be a small fraction of the current military budget, and the jobs on offer from capitalist employers would of necessity pay more and demand less. In that sense, the demand is attainable.
At the same time, as Michał Kalecki set out in one of the twentieth century’s most significant economics articles, “Political Aspects of Full Employment,” the discipline of unemployment is a political necessity for our rulers. As opposed to the centrist and explicitly pro-capitalist  “Universal Basic Income” that would substitute for welfare benefits and serve as a subsidy for low wage employers, full employment is inconsistent with the existing social order.  From our perspective at Monthly Review, the demand for full employment is therefore an exemplary “revolutionary reform.”
And, indeed, in the last two periods when (ultimately unsuccessful) mass movements for fundamental structural social change got underway in the United States, in the thirties and late sixties of the twentieth century, the demand for full employment generated widespread and significant support. This history is usefully set out in Trudy Goldberg’s “Trying Again for Full Employment .”  We are very glad to see the demand raised forcefully once again.
We therefore suggest to our friends and readers that they sign on to the Jobs for All Manifesto, and to spread the word.

Manifesto: . . ."


https://mronline.org/2019/11/21/jobs-for-all-manifesto/


https://mronline.org/2019/11/21/jobs-for-all-manifesto/

Posted by Collectivist 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

That Uplifting Tweet You Just Shared? A Russian Troll Sent It

Image
Here’s what Russia’s 2020 disinformation operations look like, according to two experts on social media and propaganda. By   DARREN LINVILL   &   PATRICK WARREN Internet trolls don’t troll. Not the professionals at least. Professional trolls don’t go on social media to antagonize liberals or belittle conservatives. They are not narrow minded, drunk or angry. They don’t lack basic English language skills. They certainly aren’t  “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds,”  as the president once put it. Your stereotypical trolls do exist on social media, but the amateurs aren’t a threat to Western democracy. Professional trolls, on the other hand, are the tip of the spear in the new digital, ideological battleground. To combat the threat they pose, we must first understand them — and take them seriously. MORE: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russia-troll-2020-election-interference-twitter-916482/ Posted by Jamie B.
Read more

The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term

Image
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term   (Photo: Photos: Getty Images) Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President  Donald Trump  could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent  Joe Biden  when more votes are tallied.  This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President  Mike Pence , with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president. This is arguably the most likely of th
Read more

Philosophical Question #14 – Lifestyle Choices

Image
Here is an interesting question in my list of philosophical questions: 1.) Should governments have penalties for those who live unhealthy lifestyles? A list of unhealthy lifestyles would include things like smoking, drinking, illegal drugs, prostitution, and other “vice” type activities. I guess the “government penalties” would be referring to monetary punishments, withholding medical treatments (insurance companies would love that), possibly imposing/regulating very high (exorbitant) prices on things considered unhealthy in order to cut down on their use, and other possibilities. 2.) Or, would you say that living an unhealthy lifestyle, likely resulting in a LOT of eventual personal pain and suffering, should be punishment enough for unhealthy lifestyles? When people make bad choices in life, often in their youth where ignorance and immediate gratification takes them over,  3.) Should a society be obligated to help "fix" them, by way of tax money?   Is that part of
Read more