A 15-year-old in Cambridge, Mass., shows off her vaping device in 2018. Schools and health officials across the U.S. are struggling to curb what they say is an epidemic of underage vaping.
Steven Senne/AP
Why does e-cigarette maker Juul advertise its product on TV when cigarette ads are banned? The short answer: Because it can.
For nearly 50 years, cigarette advertising has been banned from TV and radio. But electronic cigarettes — those battery-operated devices that often resemble oversized USB flash drives with flavored nicotine "pods" that clip in on the end — aren't addressed in the law.
Since launching its product in 2015, Juul Labs, based in San Francisco, have come to dominate the e-cigarette market, now accounting for 75 percent of e-cig sales at convenience stores and mass retail outlets, according to Bonnie Herzog, a senior analyst at Wells Fargo Securities. Until recently, TV ads haven't played a role in Juul's marketing, which relied primarily on social media.
But this year, the company launched a $10 million TV advertising campaign, "Make the Switch," that it says is aimed at helping adults find a healthier alternative to smoking cigarettes. The campaign also features print and radio ads.
Many public health advocates are skeptical of the company's repeated assertions that adult smokers are their target audience. When the company launched its sleek e-cigarette four years ago, it relied on social media outletssuch as Facebook, Instagram and Twitter to promote its product in ads that, especially at the beginning, featured playful, partying 20-somethings.
As the product caught on, young people helped spread the word to other young people, using hashtags like #juul. Social media influencers who posted content praising Juul amplified the message.
"There's overwhelming evidence that the behavior of Juul contributed to the product being sold to youth," says Dr. Robert Jackler, a professor and the principal investigator at Stanford Research Into the Impact of Tobacco Advertising at the university's medical school.
Juul says it is not targeting children and teens, and that it supports efforts to limit tobacco products to people under age 21.
"We recognize that youth use of vapor products is a problem that requires an effective and appropriate response from industry and regulatory bodies," says Ted Kwong, a Juul Labs spokesman. "We strongly support restrictions on social media marketing of vapor products."
In recent years, the number of high-school students and even younger kids who say they've used e-cigarettes has grown rapidly, alarming parents and public health advocates.
Last year, nearly 21% of high school students reported using e-cigarettes in the previous 30 days, according to an analysis of National Youth Tobacco Survey data published by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2011, the proportion was just 1.5%. Between 2017 and 2018 alone, the number of high school students who said they were current e-cigarette users grew by 78%, to more than 3 million students overall. The CDC said 1 in 20 middle-school students, those in grades 6 through 8, reported vaping in the previous 30 days.
In contrast, 3% of adults said they used e-cigarettes in 2017, according to the CDC.
E-cigarettes, also called vapes, were introduced in the United States in the mid-2000s. Some early versions resembled actual cigarettes. Juul's product can be plugged into a USB port to recharge and fits inconspicuously into the palm, often frustrating parents and teachers seeking to stop teens from using it.
There's evidence that smoking e-cigarettes may act as a "gateway" that leads young people to try cigarette smoking. And cigarette smoking remains the leading cause of preventable death, killing more than 480,000 people in the United States every year, according the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
E-cigarettes are often touted by their manufacturers as a healthier alternative to cigarette smoking, and that's the premise of Juul's "Make the Switch" campaign. The testimonial ads feature adults describing the positive changes in their lives after they gave up smoking cigarettes to use Juul.
"We want adult smokers to hear directly from former adult smokers that Juul Labs provides a true alternative to combustible cigarettes and is showing unprecedented success, with studies showing 40 to 56 percent of adult smokers fully switching within 90 days of use," Kwong says.
While it's true e-cigarettes don't produce tar, in which most of the cancer-causing chemicals from tobacco smoke are found, both products contain nicotine, which is highly addictive and can harm the developing brains of adolescents, health officials note.
In addition, the vapor that people inhale when the liquid nicotine in e-cigarettes is heated may contain some flavorings and other substances that can harm the body, according to the CDC.
Although adolescents may be more likely to see ads in social media than traditional broadcast and print ads, the Juul TV ads probably have an impact on them, says developmental psychologist Bonnie Halpern-Felsher, a professor of pediatrics at Stanford University School of Medicine who developed a tobacco prevention toolkit for teachers.
"When you say that a product is for an adult, the message is not, 'Don't use'," Halpern-Felsher says. "It's 'Use these products and you'll appear to be adult or mature'."
Anti-smoking advocates would like to see the same marketing limits applied to e-cigarettes that apply to traditional, tobacco-burning cigarettes, including banning them from advertising on TV and radio.
They would also like to see the changes that were put in place under the Master Settlement Agreement in 1998 between the largest cigarette manufacturers and the attorneys general of 46 states applied to e-cigarettes. The states had sued the cigarette makers to recover state costs for treating sick and dying smokers.
Among other things, the agreement banned most transit and billboard advertising of cigarettes, as well as branded merchandise, free product samples and sponsorships of events, such as concerts and sporting events.
E-cigarette makers, such as Juul, have used some of those advertising methods over the years.
Last year, after the federal Food and Drug Administration said it was cracking down on an "epidemic" of teen vaping, Juul announced changes to its marketing activities.
The company shut down its Facebook and Instagram accounts and limited Twitter communications to non-promotional tweets, Kwong says.
That's like closing the door to the barn after the horse has left, say public health advocates. Young people, these critics of e-cigarettes note, are continuing to post about Juul on those sites.
"It's too late," says Dave Dobbins, chief operating officer at the Truth Initiative, an anti-tobacco advocacy group. "The kids are doing their work for them."
Here’s what Russia’s 2020 disinformation operations look like, according to two experts on social media and propaganda. By DARREN LINVILL & PATRICK WARREN Internet trolls don’t troll. Not the professionals at least. Professional trolls don’t go on social media to antagonize liberals or belittle conservatives. They are not narrow minded, drunk or angry. They don’t lack basic English language skills. They certainly aren’t “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds,” as the president once put it. Your stereotypical trolls do exist on social media, but the amateurs aren’t a threat to Western democracy. Professional trolls, on the other hand, are the tip of the spear in the new digital, ideological battleground. To combat the threat they pose, we must first understand them — and take them seriously. MORE: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russia-troll-2020-election-interference-twitter-916482/ P...
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term (Photo: Photos: Getty Images) Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President Donald Trump could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent Joe Biden when more votes are tallied. This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President Mike Pence , with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president. This...
Here is an interesting question in my list of philosophical questions: 1.) Should governments have penalties for those who live unhealthy lifestyles? A list of unhealthy lifestyles would include things like smoking, drinking, illegal drugs, prostitution, and other “vice” type activities. I guess the “government penalties” would be referring to monetary punishments, withholding medical treatments (insurance companies would love that), possibly imposing/regulating very high (exorbitant) prices on things considered unhealthy in order to cut down on their use, and other possibilities. 2.) Or, would you say that living an unhealthy lifestyle, likely resulting in a LOT of eventual personal pain and suffering, should be punishment enough for unhealthy lifestyles? When people make bad choices in life, often in their youth where ignorance and immediate gratification takes them over, 3.) Should a society be obligated to help "fix" them, by way of tax money? Is that part of...
Comments
Post a Comment