☠️ Politics: Impeachment legal status update

This is about ☠️ politics, sorry. ☹️ 😒 💩

As we all know, House Repubs are gonna impeach Joe Biden for all his high crimes and misdemeanors. Naughty Joe. So far, the impeachment proceedings have been a nothingburger accompanied by lots of allegations, slanders, smoke and mirrors. But now, by golly, the Repubs have their story straight, their ducks in a row and their oars in the water. They're gonna nail naughty Joe. An impeachment legal scholar, Norman Eisen, writing for Salon comments:
House impeachment proceedings against President Joe Biden have reached a boil with new subpoenas against his brother James, his son Hunter, and one of Hunter’s business associates. As a scholar and practitioner of impeachment, I believe these subpoenas and the underlying proceedings they reflect are flawed, both legally and factually. If tested in court, the subpoenas will likely be struck down and the impeachment itself is doomed when it reaches the Senate — if it even makes it that far.

The most basic problem with the subpoenas is that you need to have a House vote formally authorizing an impeachment inquiry to issue impeachment-related subpoenas. In the first impeachment of Donald Trump, where I served as special counsel to House Democrats, we went to great lengths to secure such authorization for just that reason. Such a House vote has not happened here, meaning that enforcement of these subpoenas may prove problematic, to say the least.

Indeed, the whole impeachment process is unsound. That is because it does not meet the constitutional standard of “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” That standard is so strict that when I was representing House Democrats, they initially chose not to impeach the former president, notwithstanding powerful evidence developed by then-special counsel Robert Mueller that Trump had committed 10 possible acts of obstruction of justice. Any other American besides a sitting president would have been indicted on multiple counts for this conduct. Yet despite that, and their political adversity to then-President Trump, House Democrats did not feel the case was strong enough. [Sigh, Dems are worthless . . . . .] It was only when a whistleblower emerged with proof positive that Trump had attempted to bribe the president of Ukraine to attack as leading political opponent with hundreds of millions of dollars in U.S. aid that we finally proceeded.  
Compare that with the evidence that Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., chair of the House Oversight Committee, and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, have been pushing to support impeachment in recent weeks. The latest supposed smoking gun involves two payments James Biden made to his brother, Joe Biden. Republicans and their allies are pointing to this as evidence of a crime that rises to the level of warranting impeachment. The problem? The payments prove no such thing. The investigators surely know it—and yet they seem determined to use the payments to advance their vendetta against President Biden anyway.
Looks like more fresh nothingburgers are on tap from House Repubs. Yabba dabba doo! 🤪 👏


By Germaine: Someone interested in ☠️ politics 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

That Uplifting Tweet You Just Shared? A Russian Troll Sent It

Image
Here’s what Russia’s 2020 disinformation operations look like, according to two experts on social media and propaganda. By   DARREN LINVILL   &   PATRICK WARREN Internet trolls don’t troll. Not the professionals at least. Professional trolls don’t go on social media to antagonize liberals or belittle conservatives. They are not narrow minded, drunk or angry. They don’t lack basic English language skills. They certainly aren’t  “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds,”  as the president once put it. Your stereotypical trolls do exist on social media, but the amateurs aren’t a threat to Western democracy. Professional trolls, on the other hand, are the tip of the spear in the new digital, ideological battleground. To combat the threat they pose, we must first understand them — and take them seriously. MORE: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russia-troll-2020-election-interference-twitter-916482/ P...
Read more

The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term

Image
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term   (Photo: Photos: Getty Images) Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President  Donald Trump  could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent  Joe Biden  when more votes are tallied.  This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President  Mike Pence , with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president. This...
Read more

When Life Hands You Lemons

Image
 It's like this folks: sometimes your mind goes blank. Happens more than usual with me of course. Take this forum for instance. I wanted to post something today and couldn't think of a topic. At least not a non-sexual one and we know sexual ones lately have been frowned upon.  Then along comes one of our regulars and complains about something. Well, they might not say it was a complaint, just an observation, but it was a complaint. A minor one. It has something to do about being able to make something out of nothing. Sort of like me this morning, how to make a thread out of an empty head? But they (notice I am using the correct pronoun, not saying he or she), by what they said got me thinking. What I thought was: Not sure if that is the actual saying, if I remember correctly, I remember the saying going something like this: Umm, no, I don't think the saying I am thinking of goes that way either, maybe ONE of you good folks can remind me how the saying goes. Either way, when...
Read more