Gas Prices Aren’t That High

By Best in Moderation



Yeah, I know, we’re all panicking over gas prices right now. But really, we shouldn’t be. They’re not even close to how high they’ve been even recently.

I took the average national gas price from each month for the last 22 years, and I looked up the inflation rate per year on the US dollar. Based on that, I created a table that listed each month’s average gas price per year:

Gas Prices Aren’t That High

You’ll note that the average gas prices were really high in the late 2000s and the early 2010s. This aligns well with the economic crises of the times. Preceding the crises was a steady escalation of gas prices. But even when it does escalate, it’s not always at the same rate. Just look at 2008, for example. Prices shifted dramatically that year from month to month, as we observed the extent of the economic crisis.

So seeing the prices escalate now, why do I think we shouldn’t be worried? Well, for one we’re nearly OUT of the latest crisis, with supply chains being restored worldwide and economies getting back on their feet. The markets are good, and the prospects aren’t negative in future casting. We’re not likely to see peaks like in 2008 as we control our oil flow and prices globally stay relatively low. As more and more people move away from relying on oil, the prices will stay relatively stable. It probably won’t go down to less than $2 again, but that price was artificially low anyway. In 2020 prices dropped far lower, and now we’re seeing a swing correction.

Even looking at yearly averages, it's not really a huge spike:




Again my advice? Don’t panic. We’re doing ok.

Sources:

  • My Excel
  • https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=emm_epm0_pte_nus_dpg&f=m
  • https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

That Uplifting Tweet You Just Shared? A Russian Troll Sent It

Image
Here’s what Russia’s 2020 disinformation operations look like, according to two experts on social media and propaganda. By   DARREN LINVILL   &   PATRICK WARREN Internet trolls don’t troll. Not the professionals at least. Professional trolls don’t go on social media to antagonize liberals or belittle conservatives. They are not narrow minded, drunk or angry. They don’t lack basic English language skills. They certainly aren’t  “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds,”  as the president once put it. Your stereotypical trolls do exist on social media, but the amateurs aren’t a threat to Western democracy. Professional trolls, on the other hand, are the tip of the spear in the new digital, ideological battleground. To combat the threat they pose, we must first understand them — and take them seriously. MORE: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russia-troll-2020-election-interference-twitter-916482/ Posted by Jamie B.
Read more

The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term

Image
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term   (Photo: Photos: Getty Images) Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President  Donald Trump  could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent  Joe Biden  when more votes are tallied.  This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President  Mike Pence , with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president. This is arguably the most likely of th
Read more

Philosophical Question #14 – Lifestyle Choices

Image
Here is an interesting question in my list of philosophical questions: 1.) Should governments have penalties for those who live unhealthy lifestyles? A list of unhealthy lifestyles would include things like smoking, drinking, illegal drugs, prostitution, and other “vice” type activities. I guess the “government penalties” would be referring to monetary punishments, withholding medical treatments (insurance companies would love that), possibly imposing/regulating very high (exorbitant) prices on things considered unhealthy in order to cut down on their use, and other possibilities. 2.) Or, would you say that living an unhealthy lifestyle, likely resulting in a LOT of eventual personal pain and suffering, should be punishment enough for unhealthy lifestyles? When people make bad choices in life, often in their youth where ignorance and immediate gratification takes them over,  3.) Should a society be obligated to help "fix" them, by way of tax money?   Is that part of
Read more