Inappropriate displays of affection

 SO, my lady and I have been going swimming a lot lately, to lose weight, and we noticed "rules" posted at our public indoor swimming pools.

One of those rules reads "No inappropriate displays of affection."

SAY WHAT?

So here is a question for you all - what would YOU consider inappropriate displays of affection in public?

Or around family, friends?

How is displays of affection affected by culture, religion, who you are doing it in front of (family or strangers)?

Would a big juicy kiss, while maybe acceptable in a shopping mall be unacceptable in a church - or public indoor swimming pool? What about a prolonged hug that appears passionate? 

How about personal comfort? No one is likely to feel uncomfortable watching a couple holding hands or giving each other a light peck, but what if they are being playful and one slaps the other on the behind? Should you temper your show of affection so as to NOT offend whoever is around you?

Forget about guidelines, though there are some on the net, for example:

https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/social-instincts/202306/3-myths-about-pda-you-need-to-let-go-of

Anyways, long story short, we jokingly asked one of the lifeguards what would be considered an inappropriate display of affection and she shrugged and said "I don't know, I guess just don't fondle each other." Cute answer. So we don't. 

But what would your suggestions be? Different depending on where you are or who you are in front of?

Do you prioritize your own limits on displays of affection or do you prioritize what you worry might offend someone else?

After all, you don't want to limit your display of affection because...............

Research shows that couples often hold back from showing physical affection in public due to a fear of being judged.

Upbringing and parental influence. Childhood experiences play a significant role in shaping our values and relationship preferences. If individuals grew up in families where touch or public affection was not emphasized, or even discouraged, they may feel less inclined to engage in PDA.

Whatchathink?









Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

That Uplifting Tweet You Just Shared? A Russian Troll Sent It

Image
Here’s what Russia’s 2020 disinformation operations look like, according to two experts on social media and propaganda. By   DARREN LINVILL   &   PATRICK WARREN Internet trolls don’t troll. Not the professionals at least. Professional trolls don’t go on social media to antagonize liberals or belittle conservatives. They are not narrow minded, drunk or angry. They don’t lack basic English language skills. They certainly aren’t  “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds,”  as the president once put it. Your stereotypical trolls do exist on social media, but the amateurs aren’t a threat to Western democracy. Professional trolls, on the other hand, are the tip of the spear in the new digital, ideological battleground. To combat the threat they pose, we must first understand them — and take them seriously. MORE: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russia-troll-2020-election-interference-twitter-916482/ Posted by Jamie B.
Read more

The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term

Image
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term   (Photo: Photos: Getty Images) Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President  Donald Trump  could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent  Joe Biden  when more votes are tallied.  This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President  Mike Pence , with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president. This is arguably the most likely of th
Read more

Philosophical Question #14 – Lifestyle Choices

Image
Here is an interesting question in my list of philosophical questions: 1.) Should governments have penalties for those who live unhealthy lifestyles? A list of unhealthy lifestyles would include things like smoking, drinking, illegal drugs, prostitution, and other “vice” type activities. I guess the “government penalties” would be referring to monetary punishments, withholding medical treatments (insurance companies would love that), possibly imposing/regulating very high (exorbitant) prices on things considered unhealthy in order to cut down on their use, and other possibilities. 2.) Or, would you say that living an unhealthy lifestyle, likely resulting in a LOT of eventual personal pain and suffering, should be punishment enough for unhealthy lifestyles? When people make bad choices in life, often in their youth where ignorance and immediate gratification takes them over,  3.) Should a society be obligated to help "fix" them, by way of tax money?   Is that part of
Read more