Why some Americans have to play the identity-politics game

 



Many year ago, when we were still (sort of) innocent of the atrocity of trying to make a statesman out of Donald Trump, Ian Danskin, under the name Innuendo Studios, posted a series of videos on GamerGate, and why female and non-binary video-game critics -- notably Anita Sarkeesian of Feminist Frequency -- found it so hard to escape ruin at the hands of online, anti-feminist hate-mobs.  Part 2 was this video discussing how a simple lifestyle choice can trigger hostile reactions, even in people who agree in "principle" with the "basic idea."  He concluded his video with the following warning: "But now we circle back to people who are minoritized.  Because this reflex to anger, this distilling of a person's presence -- of their existence -- to a critique of one's self, is how white people often respond to conversations about race; how straight people often respond to conversations about sexuality; how cis people often respond to conversations about gender; and how Angry Jack responds to people like Anita Sarkeesian.

"These are people he has social and political power over.
"That makes the whole thing a whole lot uglier."

And this is why some of us can't quite give up our identity politics.  Because their presence, their entire life, is reduced to a critique of those who are constantly critiquing them.

Posted by Jennifer A. Nolan

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The MonoRacer 130E Fully Enclosed Motorcycle Aims to Redefine Personal Mobility

Invite list - authors on here please take note.

Confronting Bluster ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ’ข๐Ÿ—ฏ๐Ÿ—ฏ